People v. McQueen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McQueen

24 A.D.2d 499, 261 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3894

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 499 (People v. McQueen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McQueen, 24 A.D.2d 499, 261 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 29, 1965 after a jury trial, convicting her of murder in the second degree and sentencing her to serve a term of 20 years to life. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, namely: (1) the defendant’s failure to object to the admission of her confessions on the ground that they had been involuntarily made, and (2) the absence from the trial court’s charge of any instruction concerning the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confessions, a Jaekson-Denno hearing to determine such issue is not required to be held (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72, 77; Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 29, 1965 after a jury trial, convicting her of murder in the second degree and sentencing her to serve a term of 20 years to life. Judgment affirmed. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, namely: (1) the defendant’s failure to object to the admission of her confessions on the ground that they had been involuntarily made, and (2) the absence from the trial court’s charge of any instruction concerning the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s confessions, a Jaekson-Denno hearing to determine such issue is not required to be held (People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72, 77; Jackson v. Denno, 378 U. S. 368). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 499, 261 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcqueen-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack