People v. McNeil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McNeil

127 A.D.2d 854, 512 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43355

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 23, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 A.D.2d 854 (People v. McNeil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McNeil, 127 A.D.2d 854, 512 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered February 6, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in declining to adjudicate the defendant a youthful offender (see, CPL 720.10 [3]; People v Jordan, 115 AD2d 622; People v Williams, 78 AD2d 642). Inasmuch as the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Robinson, 105 AD2d 762; People v Taper, 105 AD2d 813, 814; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered February 6, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in declining to adjudicate the defendant a youthful offender (see, CPL 720.10 [3]; People v Jordan, 115 AD2d 622; People v Williams, 78 AD2d 642). Inasmuch as the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Robinson, 105 AD2d 762; People v Taper, 105 AD2d 813, 814; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 854, 512 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcneil-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack