People v. McNeely
This text of 124 A.D.3d 433 (People v. McNeely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), entered on or about September 13, 2011, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). Defendant’s successful completion of sex offender treatment while in prison was adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. Defendant’s assertion that he poses a diminished risk of reoffense, and thus should receive a downward departure, is without merit (see People v Rodriguez, 67 AD3d 596 [1st Dept 2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 706 [2010]). Moreover, neither defendant’s age nor his purportedly “stable lifestyle” prior to the underlying conviction warranted a downward departure, given his abhorrent crime of repeatedly raping his own daughter over a period of years.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.3d 433, 998 N.Y.S.2d 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcneely-nyappdiv-2015.