People v. McNair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McNair

278 A.D.2d 180, 718 N.Y.S.2d 175, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 180 (People v. McNair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McNair, 278 A.D.2d 180, 718 N.Y.S.2d 175, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Su[181]*181preme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered September 29, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. There was no credible evidence to support defendant’s claim that the bag in question appeared to be abandoned or that defendant believed that such was the case. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Su[181]*181preme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered September 29, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. There was no credible evidence to support defendant’s claim that the bag in question appeared to be abandoned or that defendant believed that such was the case. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 180, 718 N.Y.S.2d 175, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcnair-nyappdiv-2000.