People v. McMillian

27 A.D.3d 295, 811 N.Y.S.2d 372

This text of 27 A.D.3d 295 (People v. McMillian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McMillian, 27 A.D.3d 295, 811 N.Y.S.2d 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James A. Yates, J.), rendered September 9, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. The People’s case included identification testimony from three witnesses, as well as evidence that defendant’s car was used in the crime.

We have considered and rejected the claims contained in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.3d 295, 811 N.Y.S.2d 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcmillian-nyappdiv-2006.