People v. McMillan

42 A.D.3d 345, 838 N.Y.S.2d 565
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McMillan. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 A.D.3d 1064

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), rendered October 19, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rob[346]*346bery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of IV2 to 472 years, unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the conviction and dismissing that count of the indictment, and the matter remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this decision.

As the People concede, this robbery conviction was based on legally insufficient evidence, since the evidence did not establish the underlying larceny (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). However, pursuant to the court’s instruction, upon convicting defendant of robbery the jury stopped deliberating, and did not consider the first-degree assault count. Accordingly, defendant may be retried on that count (see People v Charles, 78 NY2d 1044, 1047 [1991]).

In view of this disposition, we decline to reach the remaining issues raised on appeal, which involve matters that would be addressed to the sound discretion of the retrial court should they arise again. Concur—Tom, J.P, Andrias, Buckley, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McMillan, 42 A.D.3d 345, 838 N.Y.S.2d 565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

42 A.D.3d 345 (People v. McMillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Charles
78 N.Y.2d 1044 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)