People v. McMichaels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McMichaels

81 A.D.2d 925, 441 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11653

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 925 (People v. McMichaels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McMichaels, 81 A.D.2d 925, 441 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 5, 1979, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Judgment affirmed. The contention that cer[926]*926tain statements made by defendant are the tainted fruit of an unconstitutional arrest has not been preserved for appellate review (see People v Jones, 81 AD2d 22). We have examined the remaining contentions raised on this appeal and find them to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 5, 1979, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Judgment affirmed. The contention that cer[926]*926tain statements made by defendant are the tainted fruit of an unconstitutional arrest has not been preserved for appellate review (see People v Jones, 81 AD2d 22). We have examined the remaining contentions raised on this appeal and find them to be without merit. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 925, 441 N.Y.S.2d 419, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcmichaels-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack