People v. McMath

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McMath

78 A.D.2d 878, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13608

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 878 (People v. McMath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McMath, 78 A.D.2d 878, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13608 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered February 22,1979, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The points raised by appellate counsel at the specific request of defendant concern matters not apparent upon the face of the record and consequently are not cognizable on appeal (see People v Nagler, 21 AD2d 490, 492). We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered February 22,1979, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The points raised by appellate counsel at the specific request of defendant concern matters not apparent upon the face of the record and consequently are not cognizable on appeal (see People v Nagler, 21 AD2d 490, 492). We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 878, 434 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcmath-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack