People v. McManus
193 A.D.2d 1139, 600 N.Y.S.2d 659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McManus. Read the opinion of the Court — 208 A.D.2d 866 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court made a thorough and proper inquiry into defendant’s competency and the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order a competency examination (see, People v Swan, 158 AD2d 158, 161, lv denied 76 NY2d 991; People v Arnold, 113 AD2d 101, 102-103). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J.— Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Balio, Doerr, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McManus, 193 A.D.2d 1139, 600 N.Y.S.2d 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
193 A.D.2d 1139 (People v. McManus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Arnold
113 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Swan
158 A.D.2d 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)