People v. McLoughlin
This text of 104 A.D.2d 320 (People v. McLoughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
— Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered December 6, 1983, which reversed an order of the Criminal Court, New York County (William Erlbaum, J.), entered July 27,1982, that had granted the motion of petitioner New York Times Company for an order unsealing records in a dismissed criminal case, is affirmed, without costs.
We affirm for the reasons stated by Appellate Term. We merely add that the cases cited as authority by petitioner are inapplicable because they either pertain (1) to situations where [321]*321the courtroom was closed for at least part of the time, or (2) to situations in which there was no termination in favor of the accused. In the instant case, the extradition hearings were conducted in an open courtroom and dismissal of the charges against defendant was a termination in favor of the accused within the meaning of CPL 160.50 (subd 2, par [i]). Concur — Sullivan, Ross, Bloom and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 A.D.2d 320, 479 N.Y.S.2d 30, 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2365, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcloughlin-nyappdiv-1984.