People v. McLeod

38 A.D.3d 798, 833 N.Y.S.2d 131
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 A.D.3d 798 (People v. McLeod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McLeod, 38 A.D.3d 798, 833 N.Y.S.2d 131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J), rendered April 29, 2004, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent determinate terms of imprisonment of 25 years for manslaughter in the first degree, 15 years for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and 7 years for criminal possession a weapon in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the term of imprisonment for manslaughter in the first degree from 25 years to 18 years and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree from 15 years to 10 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

[799]*799The trial court’s failure to charge the lesser-included offense of criminally negligent homicide was not error. Because the court charged the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the second degree, and the defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, “the court’s refusal to charge the more remote lesser-included offense of criminally negligent homicide cannot be a basis for reversal” (People v McMurry, 30 AD3d 444 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated herein (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Crane, J.E, Florio, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Conroy
102 A.D.3d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Class
101 A.D.3d 1041 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Sabatino
41 A.D.3d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.3d 798, 833 N.Y.S.2d 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcleod-nyappdiv-2007.