People v. McKnight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKnight

281 A.D.2d 293, 722 N.Y.S.2d 152, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 19, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 years to life, 7 years to life, and 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion based on the introduction of “surprise” evidence of purported uncharged crimes. The drug transactions in question constituted evidence of the charged crime of conspiracy. Moreover, defendant was on notice, through disclosure of the videotapes, that evidence of drug transactions with individuals other than the undercover officer would be introduced (see, People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, 294).

The court also properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion based on a People’s witness’s brief mention of defendant’s prior incarceration, volunteered in response to a broad question on cross-examination (see, People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 577-578). A curative instruction would have sufficed but defendant expressly declined the court’s offer of that remedy.

The court properly denied defendant’s request to instruct the jury on multiple conspiracies, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence that there was more than one conspiracy [294]*294in operation (see, United States v Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F2d 934, 963, cert denied 501 US 1233). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered November 19, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 years to life, 7 years to life, and 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion based on the introduction of “surprise” evidence of purported uncharged crimes. The drug transactions in question constituted evidence of the charged crime of conspiracy. Moreover, defendant was on notice, through disclosure of the videotapes, that evidence of drug transactions with individuals other than the undercover officer would be introduced (see, People v Ribowsky, 77 NY2d 284, 294).

The court also properly denied defendant’s mistrial motion based on a People’s witness’s brief mention of defendant’s prior incarceration, volunteered in response to a broad question on cross-examination (see, People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 577-578). A curative instruction would have sufficed but defendant expressly declined the court’s offer of that remedy.

The court properly denied defendant’s request to instruct the jury on multiple conspiracies, since there was no reasonable view of the evidence that there was more than one conspiracy [294]*294in operation (see, United States v Maldonado-Rivera, 922 F2d 934, 963, cert denied 501 US 1233). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

People v. McKnight, 281 A.D.2d 293, 722 N.Y.S.2d 152, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

281 A.D.2d 293 (People v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related