People v. McKnight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKnight

261 A.D.2d 926, 689 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5011

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements made to the police. While investigating a 911 report of a burglar alarm at an apartment building, police officers legally entered defendant’s apartment and observed but did not seize two loaded automatic weapons as well as cocaine and scales. Based on their observations, they obtained a search warrant. Although a warrantless search and seizure generally is presumed to be unreasonable (see, People v Hodge, 44 NY2d 553, 557), here the officers had reasonable grounds to believe that there was an emergency at the apartment requiring their immediate assistance for the protection of life or property; thus, the initial entry was not motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence (see, People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-179, cert denied 426 US 953). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence and statements made to the police. While investigating a 911 report of a burglar alarm at an apartment building, police officers legally entered defendant’s apartment and observed but did not seize two loaded automatic weapons as well as cocaine and scales. Based on their observations, they obtained a search warrant. Although a warrantless search and seizure generally is presumed to be unreasonable (see, People v Hodge, 44 NY2d 553, 557), here the officers had reasonable grounds to believe that there was an emergency at the apartment requiring their immediate assistance for the protection of life or property; thus, the initial entry was not motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence (see, People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-179, cert denied 426 US 953). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.

People v. McKnight, 261 A.D.2d 926, 689 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5011 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

261 A.D.2d 926 (People v. McKnight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related