People v. Mckinney

220 A.D.2d 535, 632 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9939
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [536]*536County (DeLury, J.), rendered April 15, 1993, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find no basis in the record to disturb the trial court’s determination to seat two prospective jurors after its finding that the defense counsel’s explanation for challenging those jurors had a discriminatory intent (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Allen, 86 AD2d 101; People v Hernandez, 75 NY2d 350, affd 500 US 352).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mckinney, 220 A.D.2d 535, 632 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 535 (People v. Mckinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related