People v. McKinney
9 Mich. 444, 1862 Mich. LEXIS 1
Opinion
held that it had no power to grant the motion. Notwithstanding the exceptions, the cause still remains in the Court below; and as the statute does not confer upon this Court the power to take bail, it does not possess it. The authority over that subject remains in the Circuit Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. McKinney, 9 Mich. 444, 1862 Mich. LEXIS 1 (Mich. 1862).
9 Mich. 444 (People v. McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. West
107 N.W. 283 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Thacker v. Woodring
1905 OK 60 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1905)
United States v. Hudson
65 F. 68 (W.D. Arkansas, 1894)