People v. McKinley

132 A.D.3d 498, 19 N.Y.S.3d 409
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McKinley. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 A.D.3d 1747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 2015·No. 15808 4377/11·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered April 10, 2012, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of three years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]), foreclosing review of his suppression claims. Regardless of whether defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal, his arguments for suppression of his statement are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that any error was harmless because, given the People’s disclaimer of any intention to introduce the statement, there is no “reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the plea” (People v Wells, 21 NY3d 716, 719 [2013]).

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McKinley, 132 A.D.3d 498, 19 N.Y.S.3d 409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 498 (People v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Wells
999 N.E.2d 1157 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)