People v. McKenzie

276 A.D.2d 499, 713 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McKenzie. Read the opinion of the Court — 263 A.D.2d 778

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered June 30, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and criminal use of a weapon in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McKenzie, 276 A.D.2d 499, 713 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 499 (People v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)