People v. McKenna

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKenna

197 A.D.2d 788, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10074

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 197 A.D.2d 788 (People v. McKenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McKenna, 197 A.D.2d 788, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered February 4, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while intoxicated, assault in the second degree and attempted assault in the second degree.

We have examined defendant’s claim that County Court’s imposition of consecutive, as opposed to concurrent, sentences was unduly severe and conclude that this argument is without merit. Given the heinous nature of defendant’s conduct and his past criminal history, we see no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), rendered February 4, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while intoxicated, assault in the second degree and attempted assault in the second degree.

We have examined defendant’s claim that County Court’s imposition of consecutive, as opposed to concurrent, sentences was unduly severe and conclude that this argument is without merit. Given the heinous nature of defendant’s conduct and his past criminal history, we see no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 A.D.2d 788, 604 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckenna-nyappdiv-1993.