People v. McKeever

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKeever

111 A.D.2d 190

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 111 A.D.2d 190 (People v. McKeever) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McKeever, 111 A.D.2d 190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), rendered October 6, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We agree with the hearing court’s determination that the photographic identification procedure was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 64 NY2d 738). In any event, there was an independent source for the in-court identification. Ti-tone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), rendered October 6, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We agree with the hearing court’s determination that the photographic identification procedure was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 64 NY2d 738). In any event, there was an independent source for the in-court identification. Ti-tone, J. P., Mangano, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckeever-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack