People v. McKeathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKeathan

146 A.D.2d 715, 538 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 639

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 146 A.D.2d 715 (People v. McKeathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McKeathan, 146 A.D.2d 715, 538 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), rendered October 22, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention as to the sufficiency of the factual allocution has not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue in the court of first instance (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Carter, 109 AD2d 747). In any event, the allocution was sufficient to justify the court’s acceptance of the defendant’s guilty plea (see, People v Millington, 111 AD2d 993; People v Johnson, 107 AD2d 713).

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), rendered October 22, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention as to the sufficiency of the factual allocution has not been preserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue in the court of first instance (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Carter, 109 AD2d 747). In any event, the allocution was sufficient to justify the court’s acceptance of the defendant’s guilty plea (see, People v Millington, 111 AD2d 993; People v Johnson, 107 AD2d 713).

The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.D.2d 715, 538 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckeathan-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack