People v. McIntyre

284 A.D.2d 347, 725 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5597
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered July 6, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was convicted of selling $20 worth of crack cocaine to an undercover officer in a “buy and bust” operation. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The challenged comments made by the prosecutor during summation were made in response to the defense counsel’s remarks, and did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct (see, People v Morgan, 66 NY2d 255).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

[348]*348The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., Florio, Feuerstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McIntyre, 284 A.D.2d 347, 725 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

284 A.D.2d 347 (People v. McIntyre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McIntyre
305 A.D.2d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)