People v. McIntyre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McIntyre

77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12582

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 77 A.D.2d 810 (People v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McIntyre, 77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12582 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The defendant had been indicted for a violation of section 263.05 of the Penal Law resulting from his having taken a number of Polaroid photographs of his 12-year-old niece in various degrees of undress and in various postures. County Court dismissed the indictment, holding that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient under the statute to establish that defendant had used his niece in a sexual performance. This was error. Performance is defined in subdivision 4 of section 263.00 of the Penal Law as "any play, motion picture, photograph, or dance” (emphasis supplied). Consequently the taking of the photographs with which defendant has been charged is a performance under the Penal Law and punishable thereunder (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court —dismiss indictment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The defendant had been indicted for a violation of section 263.05 of the Penal Law resulting from his having taken a number of Polaroid photographs of his 12-year-old niece in various degrees of undress and in various postures. County Court dismissed the indictment, holding that the evidence before the Grand Jury was not legally sufficient under the statute to establish that defendant had used his niece in a sexual performance. This was error. Performance is defined in subdivision 4 of section 263.00 of the Penal Law as "any play, motion picture, photograph, or dance” (emphasis supplied). Consequently the taking of the photographs with which defendant has been charged is a performance under the Penal Law and punishable thereunder (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court —dismiss indictment.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 810, 430 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcintyre-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack