People v. McIntyre

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. McIntyre

180 N.W.2d 200, 24 Mich. App. 331, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1712

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 2, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,893

StatusPublished

This text of 180 N.W.2d 200 (People v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McIntyre, 180 N.W.2d 200, 24 Mich. App. 331, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1712 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant Yirlie E. McIntyre pleaded guilty to the crime of murder in the second degree contrary to MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549). On appeal, defendant contends that she did not understandingly enter a guilty plea because, inter alia, she was not informed of the elements of first-degree murder. The appellee has filed a motion to affirm the conviction, GCR1963,817.5(3).

[332]*332A review of the plea transcript reveals that the trial judge fully complied with the requirements of GrCR 1963, 785.3 and MCLA § 768.35 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1058). People v. Carl (1968), 11 Mich App 226. The question presented here on appeal is unsubstantial and requires no argument or formal submission.

The motion to affirm the defendant’s conviction is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant Yirlie E. McIntyre pleaded guilty to the crime of murder in the second degree contrary to MCLA § 750.317 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.549). On appeal, defendant contends that she did not understandingly enter a guilty plea because, inter alia, she was not informed of the elements of first-degree murder. The appellee has filed a motion to affirm the conviction, GCR1963,817.5(3).

[332]*332A review of the plea transcript reveals that the trial judge fully complied with the requirements of GrCR 1963, 785.3 and MCLA § 768.35 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.1058). People v. Carl (1968), 11 Mich App 226. The question presented here on appeal is unsubstantial and requires no argument or formal submission.

The motion to affirm the defendant’s conviction is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 N.W.2d 200, 24 Mich. App. 331, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcintyre-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack