People v. McIntosh

127 A.D.3d 627, 5 N.Y.S.3d 874
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2015·No. 14945 4443/08·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered June 30, 2010, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of identity theft in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant is not entitled to relief under People v Peque (22 NY3d 168 [2013]). Initially, we note that defendant has not established that the exception to the preservation requirement set forth in Peque (id. at 182-183) should apply, and we decline to review defendant’s unpreserved claim in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. By advising defendant that his plea could result in deportation, the court satisfied the basic requirement of Peque (id. at 176).

Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Renwick and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McIntosh, 127 A.D.3d 627, 5 N.Y.S.3d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

127 A.D.3d 627 (People v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Peque
3 N.E.3d 617 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)