People v. McIntosh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McIntosh

267 A.D.2d 61, 699 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 61 (People v. McIntosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McIntosh, 267 A.D.2d 61, 699 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), rendered June 27, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third [62]*62degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IVs to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of defendant’s conduct, in the context of the entire transaction, provided ample evidence of accomplice liability. There was no reasonable explanation for defendant’s behavior other than his intentional participation in the sale. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andidas, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), rendered June 27, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third [62]*62degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of IVs to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The totality of defendant’s conduct, in the context of the entire transaction, provided ample evidence of accomplice liability. There was no reasonable explanation for defendant’s behavior other than his intentional participation in the sale. Concur— Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Rubin and Andidas, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 61, 699 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcintosh-nyappdiv-1999.