People v. McIntosh

202 N.W.2d 497, 42 Mich. App. 640, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 976
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 1972·No. Docket 13014·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Fitzgerald, P. J.

Defendant was convicted, upon a plea of guilty, of committing larceny in a building, a violation of MCLA 750.360; MSA 28.592. He appeals as of right.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in taking into consideration defendant’s juvenile court record in imposing sentence. In light of recent decisions of this Court, we agree that this was error. MCLA 712A.23; MSA 27.3178(598.23); and People v McFarlin, 41 Mich App 116 (1972).

Because the trial court is at this point aware of defendant’s juvenile record and we would have no way of knowing if the resentencing process would be affected by this knowledge, we direct that a new presentence report which excludes reference to defendant’s juvenile record be obtained and that defendant be resentenced by a judge other than the sentencing judge herein.

The resolution set forth above renders the other issue raised by defendant moot.

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.

T. M. Burns, J., concurred.

Holbrook, J.

(for affirmance). This writer is unable to agree with the majority opinion for reversal for the reasons stated in Justice O’Hara’s opinion in which this writer concurred in the case of People v Pence, 42 Mich App 215 (1972).

I would affirm the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McIntosh, 202 N.W.2d 497, 42 Mich. App. 640, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 976 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

202 N.W.2d 497 (People v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hill
208 N.W.2d 542 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. McLeod
206 N.W.2d 528 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
People v. Prebble
206 N.W.2d 441 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)