People v. McIlwain

226 A.D.2d 556, 641 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McIlwain. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 A.D.2d 710

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered June 29,1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to be present at sidebar conferences during voir dire (see, People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247), the record demonstrated that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently executed a waiver of this right (see, People v Epps, 37 NY2d 343, cert denied 423 US 999; People v Bernhardt, 223 AD2d 595; People v Ming Yuen, 222 AD2d 613).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McIlwain, 226 A.D.2d 556, 641 N.Y.S.2d 552, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4313 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 556 (People v. McIlwain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Epps
334 N.E.2d 566 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Antommarchi
604 N.E.2d 95 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Ming Yuen
222 A.D.2d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Bernhardt
223 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)