People v. McHale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McHale

165 A.D.2d 800, 564 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 165 A.D.2d 800 (People v. McHale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McHale, 165 A.D.2d 800, 564 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered June 16, 1988, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, no stranger to the criminal justice system, pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. Defendant’s claim that the court failed to exercise its discretion at sentencing has not been preserved as a matter of law for our review. Defendant did not move to set aside the plea bargain on this ground. We also find no merit to defendant’s claim that his sentence is excessive. The lesser sentence received by defendant’s younger brother does not establish that defendant’s sentence is unreasonable. Defendant’s background and record fully support the sentence defendant received.

Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rose Rubin, J.), rendered June 16, 1988, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, to robbery in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, is unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, no stranger to the criminal justice system, pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. Defendant’s claim that the court failed to exercise its discretion at sentencing has not been preserved as a matter of law for our review. Defendant did not move to set aside the plea bargain on this ground. We also find no merit to defendant’s claim that his sentence is excessive. The lesser sentence received by defendant’s younger brother does not establish that defendant’s sentence is unreasonable. Defendant’s background and record fully support the sentence defendant received.

Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Carro and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 A.D.2d 800, 564 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mchale-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack