People v. McGuffie

308 A.D.2d 636, 764 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 18, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 A.D.2d 636 (People v. McGuffie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McGuffie, 308 A.D.2d 636, 764 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (McGill, J.), rendered March 7, 2000, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In 1997, defendant was sentenced to six months’ incarceration and five years’ probation as the result of his conviction of the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree and attempted robbery in the second degree. While still serving his sentence of probation, defendant was arrested and charged with criminal possession of a narcotic drug with the intent to sell and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. County Court found defendant guilty of violating the terms of his probation based upon his commission of these other crimes, revoked his probation and sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of 2 to 4 years on his conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree, a class D violent felony offense, and IV2 to 3 years on his conviction of attempted assault in the second degree, a class E nonviolent felony offense.

Defendant appeals, contending that the sentences imposed by County Court were illegal because the minimum sentences were one half of the maximum sentences when the minimum sentences should have been one third of the maximum sentences. In August 1997, when defendant’s crimes were committed, the provisions of Penal Law § 70.02 (4) (L 1995, ch 3, § 4) were in effect, requiring that “a first-time violent felon who is sentenced to State prison must receive a minimum term that is one-half of the maximum” (Governor’s Approval Mem, Bill Jacket, L 1995, ch 3, § 7). Hence, having been convicted as a first-time felony offender of attempted robbery in the second [637]*637degree, a class D violent felony offense, defendant’s sentence of 2 to 4 years’ imprisonment was legal (see People v Correa, 248 AD2d 630, 631 [1998], affd 93 NY2d 821 [1999]).

County Court did, however, err by imposing a sentence of IV2 to 3 years upon defendant’s conviction of attempted assault in the second degree. The sentencing guidelines applicable to this class E nonviolent felony, also committed in August 1997, provide for a minimum term of incarceration of not “less than one year nor more than one-third of the maximum term imposed” (Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [b]). Hence, a sentence of 1 to 3 years would have been legal while the sentence imposed of IV2 to 3 years was not.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hatcher
179 N.Y.S.3d 817 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Glanda
18 A.D.3d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 A.D.2d 636, 764 N.Y.S.2d 729, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcguffie-nyappdiv-2003.