People v. McGuay

1 A.D.2d 930, 767 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1 A.D.3d 930, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12277
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 930 (People v. McGuay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McGuay, 1 A.D.2d 930, 767 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1 A.D.3d 930, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Chautauqua County Court (Ward, J.), entered December 20, 1999, convicting defendant upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, sodomy in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [3]), course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (§ 130.75 [1] [a]), and use of a child in a sexual performance (§ 263.05). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not err in refusing to allow him to present the testimony of certain witnesses in order to impeach the credibility of the victims or to recall the victims to testify in order to impeach their credibility. It is well settled that “a party may not introduce extrinsic evidence on a collateral matter solely to impeach credibility” (People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 247 [1987]; see People v Ferere, 294 AD2d 596 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 696 [2002]; People v Blanchard, 279 AD2d 808, 811 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 826 [2001]). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for an adjournment of sentencing on the ground that defense counsel was experiencing personal problems (see generally People v Singleton, 41 NY2d 402, 405 [1977]; People v Williams, 302 AD2d 903 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Pine, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hernandez
2021 NY Slip Op 01635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 930, 767 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1 A.D.3d 930, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcguay-nyappdiv-2003.