People v. McGregor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McGregor

24 A.D.2d 565, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3539

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 565 (People v. McGregor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McGregor, 24 A.D.2d 565, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3539 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “At the argument of the appeal herein, and in the briefs of both parties, an issue under the Constitution of the United States was raised and necessarily passed upon, to wit: defendant-appellant contended that confessions allegedly rendered by him to the investigating police officers should not have been admitted into evidence at the trial because defendant-appellant had not been appraised of his right to consult with counsel and to remain silent before his confession, notwithstanding that there was no objection to the admission of said confessions into evidence. In affirming the conviction herein this Court duly considered the constitutional issues involved and rejected defendant’s contentions.” Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of amending the remittitur to recite the following: “At the argument of the appeal herein, and in the briefs of both parties, an issue under the Constitution of the United States was raised and necessarily passed upon, to wit: defendant-appellant contended that confessions allegedly rendered by him to the investigating police officers should not have been admitted into evidence at the trial because defendant-appellant had not been appraised of his right to consult with counsel and to remain silent before his confession, notwithstanding that there was no objection to the admission of said confessions into evidence. In affirming the conviction herein this Court duly considered the constitutional issues involved and rejected defendant’s contentions.” Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 565, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcgregor-nyappdiv-1965.