People v. McGraw
This text of 701 N.W.2d 744 (People v. McGraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Matthew Lloyd McGRAW, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. The Court of Appeals shall, while retaining jurisdiction, remand this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for the appointment of appellate counsel pursuant to Halbert v. Michigan, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2582, 162 L.Ed.2d 552 (2005). Appointed counsel may file a supplemental application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeals within 56 days of the date of the Circuit Court's appointment order.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., concurs and states as follows:
While I concur with the order, in addition I would direct counsel to address the claim that OV 9 was misscored.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 N.W.2d 744, 473 Mich. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcgraw-mich-2005.