People v. McGee
This text of 241 A.D.2d 972 (People v. McGee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant signed a waiver of the right to appeal, the plea colloquy does not contain any reference to defendant’s waiving that right, and thus we cannot conclude that the waiver was knowing and voluntary. Defendant’s challenge to the sentence is therefore properly before us (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). We conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 5th Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Callahan, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D.2d 972, 661 N.Y.S.2d 393, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcgee-nyappdiv-1997.