People v. McGeachy
This text of People v. McGeachy (People v. McGeachy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.
Bureau Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter
Court Decisions Resources About
People v McGeachy
2026 NY Slip Op 02469
April 23, 2026
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Marques McGeachy, Defendant-Appellant.
Decided and Entered: April 23, 2026
Ind No. 1630/17|Appeal No. 6466|Case No. 2024-01429|
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kennedy, González, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ.
Law Office of Noah A. Kinigstein, New York (Noah A. Kinigstein of counsel), for appellant.
Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Mallory Phelps of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen Biben, J.), rendered December 13, 2023, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 16 years, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied youthful offender treatment. Although defendant was eligible for youthful offender treatment (CPL 720.10[1]), the record demonstrates that the court fully considered the proper factors in evaluating whether youthful offender status was appropriate (see People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 334 [3d Dept 1985], affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625 [1986]), and it providently exercised its discretion in declining to do so. We discern no basis upon which to disturb that discretionary determination, considering that defendant was convicted for his participation with a violent gang as an accomplice to murder, participated in multiple shootings, and engaged in violent conduct over a span of several months, involving multiple victims (see People v Edwards, 227 AD3d 513, 513 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 1019 [2024]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: April 23, 2026
Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI