People v. McFarlan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McFarlan

22 A.D.3d 409, 802 N.Y.S.2d 359

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.3d 409 (People v. McFarlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McFarlan, 22 A.D.3d 409, 802 N.Y.S.2d 359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), rendered April 29, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of jostling, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. As to each of the two incidents, there was credible evidence, coupled with expert testimony, that supported the inference that defendant was part of a pickpocketing team. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), rendered April 29, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree and two counts of jostling, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. As to each of the two incidents, there was credible evidence, coupled with expert testimony, that supported the inference that defendant was part of a pickpocketing team. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.3d 409, 802 N.Y.S.2d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcfarlan-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack