People v. McFadden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McFadden

126 A.D.2d 970, 511 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42083

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 126 A.D.2d 970 (People v. McFadden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McFadden, 126 A.D.2d 970, 511 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly received defendant’s statement into evidence. No CPL 710.30 notice was required because there is no question of voluntariness (People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, 37, affd 65 NY2d 837; People v Pray, 99 AD2d 915, 916). Defendant’s statement was clearly spontaneous as it was made as part of the res gestae and not in response to any questioning by police (see, People v Balschweit, 91 AD2d 1127; People v Early, 85 AD2d 752; People v Smith, 100 Misc 2d 823, 824).

We have considered the other contention raised by defendant and conclude. that it is without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—criminal possession of stolen property, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The trial court properly received defendant’s statement into evidence. No CPL 710.30 notice was required because there is no question of voluntariness (People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, 37, affd 65 NY2d 837; People v Pray, 99 AD2d 915, 916). Defendant’s statement was clearly spontaneous as it was made as part of the res gestae and not in response to any questioning by police (see, People v Balschweit, 91 AD2d 1127; People v Early, 85 AD2d 752; People v Smith, 100 Misc 2d 823, 824).

We have considered the other contention raised by defendant and conclude. that it is without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.—criminal possession of stolen property, first degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 A.D.2d 970, 511 N.Y.S.2d 745, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcfadden-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack