People v. McDuffee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McDuffee

270 A.D. 1067, 63 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 1946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 1067 (People v. McDuffee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McDuffee, 270 A.D. 1067, 63 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered upon the verdict of a jury, convicting him of rape in the second degree. The main question presented is whether, as a matter of law, there was a sufficiency of evidence corroborating the testimony of the prosecutrix to the commission of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record we are convinced that a sufficiency of such supporting evidence is found in the evidence of the acts and conduct of the accused subsequent to the date of the crime and before he was formally charged therewith. Defendant’s complaint of an unfair trial because of misconduct of certain members of the trial jury, due to conversation between them during the trial, is insufficiently supported by credible evidence. Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur. [See 271 App. Div. -760.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction rendered upon the verdict of a jury, convicting him of rape in the second degree. The main question presented is whether, as a matter of law, there was a sufficiency of evidence corroborating the testimony of the prosecutrix to the commission of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record we are convinced that a sufficiency of such supporting evidence is found in the evidence of the acts and conduct of the accused subsequent to the date of the crime and before he was formally charged therewith. Defendant’s complaint of an unfair trial because of misconduct of certain members of the trial jury, due to conversation between them during the trial, is insufficiently supported by credible evidence. Judgment of conviction affirmed. All concur. [See 271 App. Div. -760.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

270 A.D. 1067, 63 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcduffee-nyappdiv-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack