People v. McDowell

28 N.Y.S. 1130, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 890
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McDowell. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 N.Y.S. 950
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1894·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is true that the new trial in this case was granted the law; but we cannot certify that upon the facts we would affirm the conviction, for the reason that we think the evidence establishes, or that the jury might have found as facts, that the board of excise granted the defendant a license, that the commissioners of excise, composing the board, were one a de jure and the other a de facto officer, and that the defendant applied to such board for a license in good faith, believing the persons composing it to be de jure officers. See 23 N. Y. Supp. 950.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McDowell, 28 N.Y.S. 1130, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 890 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

28 N.Y.S. 1130 (People v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McDowell
23 N.Y.S. 950 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)