People v. McDowell

11 P. 868, 71 Cal. 194, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 553
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1886
DocketNo. 20227
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 P. 868 (People v. McDowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McDowell, 11 P. 868, 71 Cal. 194, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 553 (Cal. 1886).

Opinion

Ross, J.

The defendant is entitled to a new trial. The court below erred in permitting the witness Andrew J. Clunie to be asked and to answer the question: “ Please look at page 6 of this paper and state to whom the article contained upon that page under the heading ‘Sharks and Humans' (being the article alleged to be libelous) has reference.” It was for the jury to say to whom the article referred.

The court below also erred in instructing the jury as it did, in effect, that they might, if they thought proper, ignore the law defining libel. While in actions for criminal libel the jury are to determine the law as well as the facts, they are, of course, not at liberty to determine that [195]*195what the statute declares to be a criminal libel is not such.

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

McKinstry, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Heacock
76 N.W. 654 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 P. 868, 71 Cal. 194, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcdowell-cal-1886.