People v. McDonald

204 A.D.2d 1059, 613 N.Y.S.2d 98
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 A.D.2d 1059 (People v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McDonald, 204 A.D.2d 1059, 613 N.Y.S.2d 98 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defense counsel rested without calling defendant as a witness at defendant’s probation violation hearing. The court did not ask defendant whether he wished to testify. We reject defendant’s contention that the court should have done so (see, People v Fratta, 83 NY2d 771, 772). From our review of the record, we conclude that the sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J.—Violation of Probation.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Green
255 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.2d 1059, 613 N.Y.S.2d 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcdonald-nyappdiv-1994.