People v. McDonald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McDonald

120 A.D.2d 681, 502 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.2d 681 (People v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McDonald, 120 A.D.2d 681, 502 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered December 22, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocution in the court of first instance and accordingly has not preserved his claim for appellate review (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was voluntarily and knowingly entered after full consultation with counsel (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The defendant’s contention that the court should have conducted a more detailed allocution is without merit (see, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Weinstein, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered December 22, 1983, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objections to the adequacy of the plea allocution in the court of first instance and accordingly has not preserved his claim for appellate review (see, People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was voluntarily and knowingly entered after full consultation with counsel (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The defendant’s contention that the court should have conducted a more detailed allocution is without merit (see, People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert denied sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Weinstein, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 681, 502 N.Y.S.2d 100, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcdonald-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack