People v. McCutcheon

124 A.D.2d 1023, 509 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McCutcheon. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.2d 169

Opinion

Memorandum: The prosecutor’s remarks during summation were not objected to at trial, and, therefore, are not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Williams, 46 NY2d 1070, 1071). Although the remarks denigrating defendant’s case were improper, the summation did not operate to deprive defendant of a fair trial, and reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted (CPL 470.15 [3]; People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079, 1083). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J. — assault, second degree, and another offense.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCutcheon, 124 A.D.2d 1023, 509 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 1023 (People v. McCutcheon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
390 N.E.2d 299 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Hopkins
449 N.E.2d 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)