People v. McCummings

64 A.D.2d 566, 407 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12319

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered June 27, 1974, convicting defendant after jury trial of robbery, second degree, and petit larceny, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction on the petit larceny count and dismissing that count, and otherwise affirmed. Defendant, on the facts of this case, could not have committed the robbery in the second degree without also committing the petit larceny said count being inclusory and concurrent (People v Anderson, 60 AD2d 530). "Where the verdict is comprised of inclusory concurrent counts a verdict of guilty on the greatest count is deemed a dismissal of every lesser count (CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]).” (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848.) We have examined the other points urged by appellant and find them without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Birns, Fein and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCummings, 64 A.D.2d 566, 407 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

64 A.D.2d 566 (People v. McCummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Grier
340 N.E.2d 471 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Anderson
60 A.D.2d 530 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)