People v. McCray

14 A.D.2d 899, 221 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8021

Opinion

[900]*900707). Proof of sentence by the South Carolina court under the robbery count not only would show the existence of a conviction but, impliedly, that the judge presiding, on the basis of the law in South Carolina, had made a judicial determination that the “ guilty ” verdict applied to the robbery count. A conviction and sentence under the robbery count would be regarded as a felony conviction in this State irrespective of the added larceny count in the indictment (People v. Love, 305 N. Y. 722; People ex rel. Gold v. Jackson, 5 N Y 2d 243; People ex rel. Knapp v. Jackson, supra). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCray, 14 A.D.2d 899, 221 N.Y.S.2d 250, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

14 A.D.2d 899 (People v. McCray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Love
112 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)