People v. McCoy

35 A.D.3d 237, 826 N.Y.S.2d 41
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 2006·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered August 19, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of six months concurrent with five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to sentence defendant as a youthful offender. Since defendant was convicted of an armed felony, he was not eligible for youthful offender treatment without a showing of specified mitigating circumstances (CPL 720.10 [2] [a] [ii]; [3]). The record does not establish the necessary mitigation, and youthful offender treatment was not part of defendant’s plea agreement. Furthermore, given the seriousness and circumstances of the crime, youthful offender treatment was not warranted in any event (see People v Drayton, 39 NY2d 580 [1976]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Marlow, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCoy, 35 A.D.3d 237, 826 N.Y.S.2d 41 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

35 A.D.3d 237 (People v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bolton
100 A.D.3d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)