People v. McCoy

209 A.D.2d 1037, 619 N.Y.S.2d 997
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McCoy. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 437

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s sentence is neither harsh nor excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Rape, 1st Degree.) Present— Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCoy, 209 A.D.2d 1037, 619 N.Y.S.2d 997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 1037 (People v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)