People v. McCoy

124 A.D.2d 1040, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62392
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McCoy. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.2d 957

Opinion

Memorandum: The isolated remarks by the prosecutor on summation to which defendant assigns error were not objected to at trial and, therefore, are not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Williams, 46 NY2d 1070, 1071), and reversal is not warranted in the interest of justice (CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). In the totality of the circumstances, the prosecutor’s summation did not operate to deprive defendant of a fair trial (People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079, 1083; People v Woodard, 112 AD2d 454).

We have examined defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Dillon, J. — robbery, first degree, and other offenses.) (Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCoy, 124 A.D.2d 1040, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 1040 (People v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
390 N.E.2d 299 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Hopkins
449 N.E.2d 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Woodard
112 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)