People v. McCovey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCovey

281 A.D.2d 644, 722 N.Y.S.2d 394, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 644 (People v. McCovey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCovey, 281 A.D.2d 644, 722 N.Y.S.2d 394, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated June 22, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761; People v Jakins, 277 AD2d 328; People v Rose, 204 AD2d 745). The hearing minutes support the granting of that branch of the respondent’s motion which was to suppress the physical evidence (see, People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583; People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated June 22, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The factual findings and credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761; People v Jakins, 277 AD2d 328; People v Rose, 204 AD2d 745). The hearing minutes support the granting of that branch of the respondent’s motion which was to suppress the physical evidence (see, People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583; People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398). O’Brien, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 644, 722 N.Y.S.2d 394, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccovey-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack