People v. McCormick

105 A.D.2d 758, 481 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McCormick. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 723

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leone, J.), rendered March 16,1982, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant did not raise his objections as to the adequacy of the plea allocution in the court of first instance. Thus, he failed, as a matter of law, to preserve his claims for appellate review (see People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857; People v McKenzie, 88 AD2d 646).

[759]*759In any event, the absence of a complete factual recitation of the underlying facts does not require automatic reversal of the conviction, as it appears from the record that the plea was entered both knowingly and voluntarily, and with competent assistance of counsel (see People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCormick, 105 A.D.2d 758, 481 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 758 (People v. McCormick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nixon
234 N.E.2d 687 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Pascale
401 N.E.2d 904 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. McKenzie
88 A.D.2d 646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Santiago
100 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Robinson v. New York
393 U.S. 1067 (Supreme Court, 1969)