People v. McCormack

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. McCormack

718 N.W.2d 326, 476 Mich. 856

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 31, 2006·No. 130724·Published

Opinion

718 N.W.2d 326 (2006) 476 Mich. 856

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Andrew John McCORMACK, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130724, COA No. 264726.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2006 *327 order of the Court of Appeals and the motion to add issue are considered. The motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

718 N.W.2d 326 (2006) 476 Mich. 856

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Andrew John McCORMACK, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 130724, COA No. 264726.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2006 *327 order of the Court of Appeals and the motion to add issue are considered. The motion to add issue is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

People v. McCormack, 718 N.W.2d 326, 476 Mich. 856 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

718 N.W.2d 326 (People v. McCormack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew John McCORMACK, Defendant-Appellant.

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Andrew John McCORMACK, Defendant-Appellant.